Comparisons of three different methods used to generate forest landscapes for spatial harvest scheduling problems with adjacency restrictions
Palabras clave:
Simulation, Voronoi diagrams, random graphs, grids, adjacency constraintsResumen
Dealing with adjacency constraints is currently one of the main research focuses of spatial harvest scheduling problems. In many situations, hypothetical landscapes are generated for research purposes. The simulation methods used to produce hypothetical landscapes are important and may affect the planning solutions. In this study, we examined three landscape simulation methods (grids, Voronoi diagrams, and random graphs) and compared them to a forest developed using irregularly-shaped polygons within a geographic information system. The effects on the optimal planning solutions due to different spatial layouts were investigated as well. The results show that landscape simulation methods have a significant impact on the mean solution values and CPU running time due to different adjacency patterns in each simulated landscape. Advantages and disadvantages using each of the three methods are discussed and useful suggestions are provided regarding the selection of one particular method for research purposes.
Descargas
Publicado
2010-02-28
Número
Sección
Special Section on Systems Analysis in Forest Resources
Licencia
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors grant the journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) following the publication by the journal, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Cómo citar
Comparisons of three different methods used to generate forest landscapes for spatial harvest scheduling problems with adjacency restrictions. (2010). Mathematical and Computational Forestry & Natural-Resource Sciences (MCFNS), 2(1), Pages: 53-60 (8). https://mcfns.com/index.php/Journal/article/view/2.9
