[1]
“Evaluating traditional peer-review processes and their alternatives: An opinionated discussion”, Math. Comput. For. Nat. Res. Sci., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 81–92(12), Sep. 2015, Accessed: Oct. 30, 2026. Available: https://mcfns.com/index.php/Journal/article/view/7.8